[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place |
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2009 03:09:23 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.93 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
> I see. I have never much thought about that. If anyone has some
> argument why it might be better that Proced used something else
> instead of a simple call of pop-to-buffer, I'd be happy to use some
> appropriate code. Otherwise I suggest to keep it the way it is now
> (or wait till after the next release). Certainly, Proced is
> different from Dired in the sense that normally one will have only
> one such buffer.
Indeed, with its Dired-like keybindings it is still different from Dired
in regard to displaying a Proced window itself where it is more like
a Buffer List (`C-x C-b'). So e.g. as it's easy to add "*Buffer List*"
to `same-window-buffer-names', it's easy to add "*Proced*" as well
and to do other standard customizations allowed by `pop-to-buffer'.
This is unlike a non-standard treatment of displaying a window with
a list of selected items to process. I think no change is needed
for `pop-to-buffer' that displays a Proced window.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, (continued)
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2009/05/18
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Stefan Monnier, 2009/05/18
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2009/05/18
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Roland Winkler, 2009/05/18
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2009/05/18
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Roland Winkler, 2009/05/18
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Stefan Monnier, 2009/05/18
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place,
Juri Linkov <=