[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails
From: |
Daiki Ueno |
Subject: |
bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:54:49 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.96 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> In <87ws5sv6tb.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de>
>>>>> Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> > Does replacing (sleep-for 0.1) with:
> >
> > (epg--process-filter (epg-context-process context) "")
> >
> > change the situation?
> It has the same effect as (sleep-for 0.1): It helps, but only
> slightly.
Hmm, is your epg-debug output as innocent as the one that the original
reporter provided?
Currently, I suspect that the code in the following clause might be
skipped:
(unless epg-process-filter-running ...)
Can you insert debug-prints in epg-wait-for-completion? It would be
something like:
(message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running)
Regards,
--
Daiki Ueno
- bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails, Torsten Bronger, 2009/07/27
- bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails, Daiki Ueno, 2009/07/28
- bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails, Torsten Bronger, 2009/07/28
- bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails,
Daiki Ueno <=
- bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails, Torsten Bronger, 2009/07/29
- bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails, Daiki Ueno, 2009/07/29
- bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails, Torsten Bronger, 2009/07/30
- bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails, Daiki Ueno, 2009/07/30
- bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails, Torsten Bronger, 2009/07/30