bug#4350: marked as done (tramp "sudo" and "su" broken: `\stat -c '(("%N") [...]' returns with error)

[Emacs bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:29:42 +0200
with message-id <87fxb0gewp.fsf@gmx.de>
and subject line Re: bug#4350: tramp "sudo" and "su" broken: `\stat -c '(("%N") 
[...]' returns with error
has caused the Emacs bug report #4350,
regarding tramp "sudo" and "su" broken: `\stat -c '(("%N") [...]' returns with 
error
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
4350: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=4350
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> tramp "sudo" and "su" broken: `\stat -c '(("%N") [...]' returns with error
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sat, 05 Sep 2009 19:26:39 +0300
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> The current (Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:26:16 +0000) Emacs trunk repository has
> broken tramp /su and /sudo protocol. To reproduce:
>
>     $ emacs -Q
>
>     C-x C-f /su::/root/test.txt
>
>     [Type password]
>
> The result:
>
>     tramp-error: `\stat -c '(("%N") %h %u %g %X.0 %Y.0 %Z.0 %s.0 "%A" t
>     %i.0 -1)' /root/test.txt' returns with error
>
>
>
> --- End Message ---
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: bug#4350: tramp "sudo" and "su" broken: `\stat -c '(("%N") [...]' returns with error
>
>
>
>
> Date: 
>
> Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:29:42 +0200
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux)
>
>
>
>
> Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> writes:
>
> > On 2009-09-06 16:29 (+0200), Michael Albinus wrote:
> >
> >> Since the patch does not modify more than 15 lines (the rest are just
> >> changed indented lines), I've committed it as tiny patch. The problem
> >> shall be fixed now.
> >
> > I tested it very quickly but looks like it's indeed fixed. Thanks.
>
> OK, I mark it as fixed.
>
> Best regards, Michael.
>
> --- End Message ---