bug#4440: 23.1.50; Add .dx32fsl to completion-ignored-extensions

[Leo]

On 2009-09-25 12:42 +0100, Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 16:36, Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am surprised to see that .dx64fsl is on completion-ignored-extensions
>> while .dx32fsl is not.
>>
>> '.dx32fsl' is produced by 32 bit clozure-cl¹. So I'd propose to add it
>> to the list.
>
> Apparently, OpenMCL / Clozure uses different extensions for fasl
> according to target architecture:
>
> http://ccl.clozure.com/ccl-documentation.html#building-definitions
>
> The attached patch adds them all, though I think they're a bit too
> much. Any way to know which of these are commonly used?
>
>     Juanma
>
> Index: lisp/bindings.el
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lisp/bindings.el,v
> retrieving revision 1.225
> diff -u -2 -r1.225 bindings.el
> --- lisp/bindings.el  14 Sep 2009 23:28:43 -0000      1.225
> +++ lisp/bindings.el  22 Sep 2009 13:43:44 -0000
> @@ -602,7 +602,10 @@
>        ;; CMUCL
>        ".x86f" ".sparcf"
> -         ;; Other CL implementations (Allegro, LispWorks, OpenMCL)
> -         ".fasl" ".ufsl" ".fsl" ".dxl" ".pfsl" ".dfsl"
> -      ".p64fsl" ".d64fsl" ".dx64fsl"
> +      ;; OpenMCL / Clozure CL
> +      ".dfsl" ".pfsl" ".d64fsl" ".p64fsl" ".lx64fsl" ".lx32fsl"
> +      ".dx64fsl" ".dx32fsl" ".fx64fsl" ".fx32fsl" ".sx64fsl"
> +      ".sx32fsl" ".wx64fsl" ".wx32fsl"
> +         ;; Other CL implementations (Allegro, LispWorks)
> +         ".fasl" ".ufsl" ".fsl" ".dxl"
>        ;; Libtool
>        ".lo" ".la"

Many thanks for investigating this further. Unfortunately I am not too
familiar with ccl. I changed from sbcl to ccl because threads are better
supported in ccl on OSX. Could you ask in gmane.lisp.openmcl.devel?

Leo