[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#4837: with-fewer-warnings ?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
bug#4837: with-fewer-warnings ? |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:31:19 -0400 |
Eg (with-fewer-warnings '(obsolete cl-functions) ...)
would not warn about obsolete things or cl-functions in the body. The
possible arguments are the members of byte-compile-warnings.
I can implement this if it is considered worth it (it's very similar
to with-no-warnings).
I think it isn't worth doing, because it would only gain you very much
if you put a lot of code inside with-no-warnings; we avoid doing that.