[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#4970: 23.1; Emacs Gtk running nuts
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#4970: 23.1; Emacs Gtk running nuts |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:11:30 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:11:15 +0100
> From: Jan Djärv <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>
> CC: 4970@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, dann@ics.uci.edu
>
> > And btw, are there any live frames when the test in term.c is made, in
> > the recipe to reproduce the original bug? If not, maybe it needs to
> > check for live frames explicitly.
>
> Yes there are. When read_socket_hook returns -2 and this is the last
> terminal,
> a SIGHUP is sent to ourselves (why not just call shutdown_emacs and exit?)
> and
> Fdelete_terminal is called. So frames has not been removed yet.
Perhaps we should delete the frames instead of erroring out. Would
that work?
- bug#4970: 23.1; Emacs Gtk running nuts, Werner Fink, 2009/11/19
- bug#4970: 23.1; Emacs Gtk running nuts, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/19
- bug#4970: 23.1; Emacs Gtk running nuts, Jan Djärv, 2009/11/20
- bug#4970: 23.1; Emacs Gtk running nuts, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/20
- bug#4970: 23.1; Emacs Gtk running nuts, Jan Djärv, 2009/11/20
- bug#4970: 23.1; Emacs Gtk running nuts, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/20
- bug#4970: 23.1; Emacs Gtk running nuts, Jan Djärv, 2009/11/20
- bug#4970: 23.1; Emacs Gtk running nuts,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#4970: 23.1; Emacs Gtk running nuts, Jan Djärv, 2009/11/20
- bug#4970: 23.1; Emacs Gtk running nuts, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/20
bug#4970: marked as done (23.1; Emacs Gtk running nuts), Emacs bug Tracking System, 2009/11/25