[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5372: Calling url-retrieve-synchronously in a timer
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
bug#5372: Calling url-retrieve-synchronously in a timer |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:17:49 +0100 |
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Stefan Monnier
<monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>> It looks like url-retrieve-synchronously is not finished when run in a
>> timer. Is that expected behaviour?
>> It looks like it hangs in accept-process-output.
>
> It's not expected (for me anyway), but I'm not completely
> surprised either.
So do you consider it a bug? Or should it rather be documented for the
moment? Does it work the same way on other platforms? (I tested on
w32, forgot to mention that.)
> Furthermore, it doesn't look like a good thing to
> do anyway: timer code should not run for an indefinite amount of time,
Maybe you misunderstod me. If I do the call to
url-retrieve-synchronously from the command loop it finishes very
quickly (in this case), but if I do the same thing in a timer it
hangs.
> so you should probably use url-retrieve instead.
Thanks. Yes, I already did and that solved my problem, but the bug
report is not about that.