[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5408: date-to-time problem
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
bug#5408: date-to-time problem |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:32:32 +0100 |
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 17:29, Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> wrote:
> I think he meant "can't *you* please just put in the remarks".
Ah. Why would it be more effective that *I* do it, instead of doing it himself?
Juanma
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, (continued)
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Chong Yidong, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Chong Yidong, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18