[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5679: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest
From: |
osv |
Subject: |
bug#5679: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:05:07 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> writes:
>>>>>> On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:06:35 -0500, Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
>>>>>> said:
>
>> <osv@javad.com> writes:
>>> $ emacs -q --no-site-file
>>> - Move cursor to the /ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY/ text in the splash
>>> screen
>>> - M-x customize-face <ENTER> <ENTER>
>>> - Change "Font Family:" to "terminus"
>>> - Select "State|Set for Current Session"
>>> - C-x b <ENTER> to return to splash screen, and
>>>
>>> /ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY/ looks like in the attached file.
>
>> Fraid I still can't reproduce this. One possibility I can think of is
>> that the particular version of terminus you are using is buggy, and
>> reports the right overhang incorrectly. Strange...
>
> I tried installing the PCF fonts extracted from
> xfonts-terminus-oblique_4.26-2.1_all.deb to ~/.fonts on Mac OS X 10.6.
> The result was:
>
> 1. I could reproduce the above problem on Emacs 23.1.92.
> 2. But I could also reproduce it on Emacs 23.1, unlike OP.
No, I, the OP, can also reproduce it on Emacs 23.1. Here is what I wrote
in the original report:
" Small example screenshots from emacs 22.2.1 (correct rendering) and
emacs 23.1.93 (wrong rendering) are attached. Please notice how ugly
"Global Mark Ring" looks when rendered by emacs23.
NOTE: emacs 23.1.1 also renders wrong."
> 3. `xterm -fa terminus:style=oblique' showed the same problem.
> 4. I also tried my preliminary proof-of-concept cairo port (*)
> adjusted to Emacs 23.1.91, and it didn't show the problem. This
> explains why many GNOME and GTK+ apps don't show the problem with
> the same fonts.
>
> So, at least for my case, a possible explanation is that it is a
> problem in Xft drawing for some versions or settings. What's not
> explained is the inconsistency between the result 2 above and OP's
> experience with Emacs 23.1.
Emacs 23.1 behaves slightly different for me, but it still renders
wrong, so there is no inconsistency here.
-- Sergei.
- bug#5679: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest, (continued)
- bug#5679: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/03/10
- bug#5679: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest, osv, 2010/03/10
- bug#5679: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/03/10
- bug#5679: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest, osv, 2010/03/10
- bug#5679: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/03/10
- bug#5679: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/03/10
- bug#5679: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest,
osv <=