[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#6255: the notation of AF_LOCAL sockets in list-process
From: |
Masatake YAMATO |
Subject: |
bug#6255: the notation of AF_LOCAL sockets in list-process |
Date: |
Mon, 24 May 2010 15:45:36 +0900 (JST) |
This is a bug report with a patch. Please include the patch
if appreciated.
When `local' is given as :family keyword arugment of `make-network-process',
AF_LOCAL(also known as AF_UNIX) socket is created. This behavior is not changed
even if :host keyword arugment is given. This is O.K. But `list-process'
doesn't
work as we expected.
I'll explain the detail with example:
(let ((port "/dev/log"))
(make-network-process :name "syslog"
:host "127.0.0.1"
:noquery t
:service port
:family 'local
:type 'datagram))
Although "127.0.0.1" is specified at :host but `local' is
specified at :family, so `make-network-process' creates AF_LOCAL socket.
But M-x list-process tells
Proc Status Buffer Command
---- ------ ------ -------
syslog open (none) (network datagram connection to 127.0.0.1)
This should be
Proc Status Buffer Command
---- ------ ------ -------
syslog open (none) (network datagram connection to /dev/log)
2010-05-23 Masatake YAMATO <yamato@redhat.com>
* process.c (Fmake_network_process): Reset `host'
property if family is AF_LOCAL.
=== modified file 'src/process.c'
*** src/process.c 2010-05-04 04:00:10 +0000
--- src/process.c 2010-05-23 17:52:30 +0000
***************
*** 3352,3357 ****
--- 3352,3359 ----
{
/* Host is not used. */
host = Qnil;
+ contact = Fplist_put (contact, QChost, Qnil);
+
CHECK_STRING (service);
bzero (&address_un, sizeof address_un);
address_un.sun_family = AF_LOCAL;
- bug#6255: the notation of AF_LOCAL sockets in list-process,
Masatake YAMATO <=