[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:21:06 -0700 |
> Deleting other windows when resizing was a misguided feature.
I'm very glad to hear you say that, sincerely.
> I don't do that any more for quite some time and didn't
> miss it yet ;-)
FWIW, I still see it happening in:
GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
of 2010-06-07 on 3249CTO
And unfortunately, I need my code to work in multiple Emacs versions. It is
only for Emacs 23 (.1 and .2 and more recent) that this is a problem - I do not
see it happening before 23. So even if you might have a more recent version with
a fix I will still need a workaround for use with Emacs 23.
Is there a simple way to prevent deletion of other windows when using
`fit-window-to-buffer'? So far, I've just been let-binding `min-window-height'
to 1 around the call. Other suggestions welcome.
The use case of wanting to show as much of a buffer as possible without deleting
other windows in the frame, and also shrinking the window to the buffer size
when it can all be shown, has got to be a common use case.
Also, for the same type of buffer/window (typically a pop-up window such as
*Completions*), it would be good to have a simple way to make scrolling not show
half a window of blank space after the buffer text, when you scroll near the
buffer bottom. IOW, be able to have the end of the buffer act similarly to the
beginning: not have the window go beyond eob.
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/09
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/11
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/11
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer,
Drew Adams <=
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/13