[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:20:09 +0200 |
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:34 PM, martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> wrote:
>
> Please post a recipe for reproducing the problem. I never had any
> problem with this in practice so I can't tell.
>
>> What are your thoughts about let-binding `min-window-height'? What are the
>> cases
>> where that won't fix the problem?
>
> Let-binding `window-min-height' (I suppose that's the variable you mean)
> can be used to make a window less than `window-min-height' high. Doing
> this can eventually cause the deletion of that window after the binding
> has been exited. This is not a speciality of `fit-window-to-buffer' but
> a consequence of the fact that Emacs can delete windows that are smaller
> than `window-min-height' high.
I am currently let-binding window-min-height to something smaller than
window-min-height, but I have never seen any problem because of that.
I think it is very practical to be able to do let-bind
window-min-height this way. I can look at the code of course and found
out, but where is is possible deleting of small height windows done?
Is there a thought behind it or is it a bug?
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, (continued)
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/12
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer,
Lennart Borgman <=
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/13
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, martin rudalics, 2010/06/14
- bug#6385: A slightly less aggressive fit-window-to-buffer, Drew Adams, 2010/06/14