[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#6997: Loading w32-fns under X11 signals an error
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#6997: Loading w32-fns under X11 signals an error |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:18:57 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:33:09 +0200
> Cc:
>
> The title says it. It probably also messes with things, additionally to
> signalling an error. Of course, you will say "don't do that", but
> remember that files may be loaded for all kinds of reasons, so they
> should be harmless.
"Harmless" in what sense? Should they do nothing at all? Probably
not, or else you wouldn't be loading them, right?
Even in your specific use-case, did you want the w32-fns functions to
end up in the obarray or not?
IOW, can you come up with a general enough definition of the reason(s)
for loading w32-fns on non-w32 systems? Without such a definition, I
don't see how can we do anything except making the entire file be
ignored on any system but w32.
- bug#6997: Loading w32-fns under X11 signals an error, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/08
- bug#6997: Loading w32-fns under X11 signals an error, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/09/11
- bug#6997: Loading w32-fns under X11 signals an error,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#6997: Loading w32-fns under X11 signals an error, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/13
- bug#6997: Loading w32-fns under X11 signals an error, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/13
- bug#6997: Loading w32-fns under X11 signals an error, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/13
- bug#6997: Loading w32-fns under X11 signals an error, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/09/13
- bug#6997: Loading w32-fns under X11 signals an error, Stefan Monnier, 2010/09/14
- bug#6997: Loading w32-fns under X11 signals an error, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/09/14