[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#7388: 24.0.50; "Active processes exist; kill them and exit anyway?"
|
From: |
jidanni |
|
Subject: |
bug#7388: 24.0.50; "Active processes exist; kill them and exit anyway?" or let them live on, but exit emacs |
|
Date: |
Sat, 13 Nov 2010 02:57:10 +0800 |
"Active processes exist; kill them and exit anyway? (yes or no)"
Why is there no third choice: "let them live on, but exit emacs"?
Hasn't emacs ever heard of bash's $ help disown etc.? How could mighty
emacs not be capable of things like that?
And the whole thing should be reworded clearer too.
Perhaps even implement choosing which processes are to live on after
emacs exits.
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#7388: 24.0.50; "Active processes exist; kill them and exit anyway?" or let them live on, but exit emacs,
jidanni <=