[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:40:07 +0200 |
> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Cc: <rgm@gnu.org>, <8119@debbugs.gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 07:27:20 -0800
>
> > FWIW, I see no harm at all in retitling, and I do see a certain
> > value in having the title express the essence of the bug report.
>
> And do you see such a policy as the general practice elsewhere?
On my daytime job, I frequently retitle bug reports, because many of
my co-workers don't know how to express themselves in English too
well. I have yet to see anyone complain about that; all of the
correspondence about bugs quotes their numbers anyway.
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Drew Adams, 2011/02/25
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Glenn Morris, 2011/02/25
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Drew Adams, 2011/02/25
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Glenn Morris, 2011/02/26
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Drew Adams, 2011/02/26
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/26
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Drew Adams, 2011/02/26
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Drew Adams, 2011/02/26
bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/26
bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string, Andreas Schwab, 2011/02/26