[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#7952: 24.0.50; crash in find_interval
From: |
Romain Francoise |
Subject: |
bug#7952: 24.0.50; crash in find_interval |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Mar 2011 16:16:33 +0100 |
Hi Eli,
Thanks for your help.
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> Can you show the value of relative_position and of TOTAL_LENGTH
> (tree)?
As you can see from the backtrace in my original report, tree is
NULL when `find_interval' is called, so TOTAL_LENGTH(tree) is 0.
(gdb) f 5
#5 0x00000000006612b8 in find_interval (tree=0x0, position=1626800)
at intervals.c:635
635 abort (); /* Paranoia */
(gdb) p relative_position
$1 = 1626799
(gdb) p tree
$2 = (INTERVAL) 0x0
(gdb) p position
$3 = 1626800
(gdb)
> Perhaps I didn't move around enough -- does it take you a lot?
It's usually enough to do M-> and M-v, but sometimes it takes a
little more moving around to get it to crash (but it never takes
more than a few seconds).
- bug#7952: 24.0.50; crash in find_interval, Romain Francoise, 2011/03/09
- bug#7952: 24.0.50; crash in find_interval, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/09
- bug#7952: 24.0.50; crash in find_interval,
Romain Francoise <=
- bug#7952: 24.0.50; crash in find_interval, Romain Francoise, 2011/03/18
- bug#7952: 24.0.50; crash in find_interval, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/18
- bug#7952: 24.0.50; crash in find_interval, Romain Francoise, 2011/03/18
- bug#7952: 24.0.50; crash in find_interval, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/19
- bug#7952: 24.0.50; crash in find_interval, Andreas Schwab, 2011/03/19
- bug#7952: 24.0.50; crash in find_interval, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/03/19
- bug#7952: 24.0.50; crash in find_interval, Andreas Schwab, 2011/03/19
- bug#7952: 24.0.50; crash in find_interval, Romain Francoise, 2011/03/19