bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#8290: possibly-uninitialized variables in find_automatic_composition


From: Paul Eggert
Subject: bug#8290: possibly-uninitialized variables in find_automatic_composition
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:12:34 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8

Severity: minor

In the Emacs trunk, src/composite.c's find_automatic_composition has
two local variables 'check' and 'prev' that gcc -Wuninitialized warns
as being possibly being uninitialized when used.  This function has
multiple gotos and dependencies on data structures that I don't
understand, so it's not clear to me that GCC is wrong here.  So I'm
filing a bug report in the hopes that someone more expert can look at it.

I plan to work around the diagnostic by committing the following
change, which adds a FIXME comment asking for initial value if needed,
and for the comment to be removed if the code is OK as-is.  IF_LINT
is used to tell GCC not to issue a warning here, for now.

I'm CC:ing this to Kenichi Handa, who committed the code in question,
to give him a heads-up about the problem.


* composite.c (find_automatic_composition): Mark vars as initialized, with a 
FIXME.
=== modified file 'src/composite.c'
--- src/composite.c     2011-03-19 00:58:10 +0000
+++ src/composite.c     2011-03-19 01:02:12 +0000
@@ -1489,7 +1489,13 @@
   EMACS_INT head, tail, stop;
   /* Limit to check a composition after POS.  */
   EMACS_INT fore_check_limit;
-  struct position_record orig, cur, check, prev;
+  struct position_record orig, cur;
+
+  /* FIXME: It's not obvious whether these two variables need initialization.
+     If they do, please supply initial values.
+     If not, please remove this comment.  */
+  struct position_record check IF_LINT (= {0}), prev IF_LINT (= {0});
+
   Lisp_Object check_val, val, elt;
   int c;
   Lisp_Object window;






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]