[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8463: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Direct Edit in *Occur* Buffer
From: |
Andrew W. Nosenko |
Subject: |
bug#8463: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Direct Edit in *Occur* Buffer |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:36:49 +0300 |
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 22:35, Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> wrote:
> "Andrew W. Nosenko" <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>>> Or "e" (for edit; like in Rmail).
>>>
>>> That sounds good.
>>
>> But not for case, when user already switched the *Occur* buffer into
>> read/write mode for editing the buffer itself (not the underlying
>> files/buffers, where occurrences come from).
>
> That's already the case with "r" (occur-rename-buffer), "c"
> (clone-buffer), and "o" (occur-mode-goto-occurrence-other-window).
>
Yes, but: (1) these actions aren't destructive in respect to the
original data, and (2) I would to prefer to see the number of such
bindings decreasing, not increasing.
--
Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com>
- bug#8463: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Direct Edit in *Occur* Buffer, (continued)
bug#8463: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Direct Edit in *Occur* Buffer, Leo, 2011/06/09
- bug#8463: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Direct Edit in *Occur* Buffer, Glenn Morris, 2011/06/09
- bug#8463: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Direct Edit in *Occur* Buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2011/06/10
- bug#8463: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Direct Edit in *Occur* Buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2011/06/10
- bug#8463: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Direct Edit in *Occur* Buffer, Andrew W. Nosenko, 2011/06/11
- bug#8463: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Direct Edit in *Occur* Buffer, Juri Linkov, 2011/06/11
- bug#8463: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Direct Edit in *Occur* Buffer, Andrew W. Nosenko, 2011/06/12
- bug#8463: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Direct Edit in *Occur* Buffer, Chong Yidong, 2011/06/18
- bug#8463: 24.0.50; [PATCH] Direct Edit in *Occur* Buffer,
Andrew W. Nosenko <=