bug#8891: 23.3; save-buffer messages about writing files that may not be written

[Chong Yidong]

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

>> Yes... until `save-buffer' calls `basic-save-buffer' which invokes
>> `write-file-functions', one of which decides to override the notion of
>> "modified-ness" when it ascertains that the contents have not actually
>> changed.  So modp tells the truth at the time it's checked, but IMO it's
>> checked too early.
>
> Right.  So perhaps `basic-save-buffer-2' is the right place to output
> the message?  I've grepped through the .el files, and there doesn't seem
> to be any other callers other than the straight line down from
> `save-buffer'.
>
> Opinions, anybody?

I don't think it's worth changing.