[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#7729: 24.0.50; doc string of `image-mode-fit-frame'
|
From: |
Drew Adams |
|
Subject: |
bug#7729: 24.0.50; doc string of `image-mode-fit-frame' |
|
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:29:26 -0700 |
> > Actually, the command name should reflect this behavior:
> > `toggle-fit-frame-to-image' or some such.
>
> No, I don't think that's warranted.
Why not?
The command only does what the current name says 50% of the time. It does what
the new, suggested name says 100% of the time.
Not to mention that `-mode-' here is unnecessary verbiage. The command toggles
frame fitting to an image.
Why not improve things by giving it a name that fits?