[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:49:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Leo <sdl.web@gmail.com> writes:
> But every seeding interrupts the internal random state (which is out of
> our control at the moment) and break the users' train of random numbers.
>
> Also if you grep (random t) in the lisp/, you can see there is some
> effort in making a package only change the random state at most once.
Once per package? That means that it's called many times in a single
Emacs session, so I don't really see the problem.
This should really be fixed by Emacs calling `(random t)' at startup.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
- bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id, Leo, 2011/07/18
- bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/07/19
- bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id, Leo, 2011/07/19
- bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/07/19
- bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id, Leo, 2011/07/19
- bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id, Leo, 2011/07/19
- bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/07/20
- bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id, Leo, 2011/07/21
- bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id, Juanma Barranquero, 2011/07/21
- bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id, Leo, 2011/07/21
- bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/07/31
- bug#9118: 23.3.50; Don't seed the RNG in message-unique-id, Leo, 2011/07/31