[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight'
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight' |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Sep 2011 06:55:12 -0700 |
> > The doc string should say that the fringe indication is
> > moved when some other locus replaces it - just as it says
> > this for a value of `t'.
>
> Is this better?
>
> +If `fringe-arrow', indicate the locus by the fringe arrow
> +indefinitely until some other locus replaces it."
Yes, thanks.
(And FWIW I still think we should also have a value `until-move' that does the
same thing - stay until some other locus replaces it - but using highlighting
instead of fringe. I've been using that for years myself, so I obviously prefer
it - I generally don't show the fringe.)
- bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight', Drew Adams, 2011/09/03
- bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight', Juri Linkov, 2011/09/05
- bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight',
Drew Adams <=
- bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight', Juri Linkov, 2011/09/06
- bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight', Drew Adams, 2011/09/06
- bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight', Juri Linkov, 2011/09/07
- bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight', Drew Adams, 2011/09/07
- bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight', Juri Linkov, 2011/09/07
- bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight', Stefan Monnier, 2011/09/07
- bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight', Drew Adams, 2011/09/08
- bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight', Juri Linkov, 2011/09/08
- bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight', Stefan Monnier, 2011/09/08
- bug#9432: 24.0.50; doc string of `next-error-highlight', Drew Adams, 2011/09/08