[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:43:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>> Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>>
>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> -o and -g does not imply -l.
>>>
>>> They do.
>>
>> -g like -l, but do not list owner
>
> Like I said.
Like I said, it's like -l, but does not imply -l.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/10
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- bug#9301: dired-sort-toggle-or-edit should also mention -o and -g, Andreas Schwab, 2011/09/11