bug#9653: 24.0.50; `ucs-names' - Why all of the ("" . XXX) entries?

[Juanma Barranquero]

On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 15:02, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:

> (or x "") is much more lispy

There's nothing unlispy in the other code. Sometimes simplicity can be
attained, and sometimes the answer is more complex.

> and does not require repeating a value.

Yes. let-bindings exist for a reason.

But the point is, it seems probable that the "" interface is more
according to what a get-char-code-property user would expect. At
least, it's what I would expect.

    Juanma