On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Chong Yidong
<cyd@stupidchicken.com> wrote:
Zachary Kanfer <zkanfer@gmail.com> writes:
> The command list-buffers always puts point at the end of the
> buffer. This patch changes the list-buffers command to simply revert
> the buffer if point is inside the *Buffer List* buffer. Since point is
> kept at the same line, the user can more easily see what changes have
> occurred.
This doesn't seem like a good idea. It is better for `list-buffers' to
behave as unsurprisingly as possible, i.e. regardless of whether it's
called from a buffer list.
After all, the user can always call revert-buffer if that's what's
desired.