[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#641: bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#641: bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:21:57 +0200 |
> From: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
> Cc: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>, drew.adams@oracle.com,
> 9794@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 23:40:20 +0800
>
> So Paul is probably correct - we should not worry about RFC / POSIX or
> whatever compliance for %Z.
Thanks. So, since everybody agrees, I committed as revision 106162
the changes to nt/config.nt that make current-time-zone and the
strftime's %Z format return a non-empty string on MS-Windows.
- bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, (continued)
- bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, Andreas Schwab, 2011/10/20
- bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/20
- bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, Andreas Schwab, 2011/10/20
- bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/20
- bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, Andreas Schwab, 2011/10/20
- bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/20
- bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, Paul Eggert, 2011/10/20
- bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/20
- bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, Jason Rumney, 2011/10/21
- bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, Paul Eggert, 2011/10/21
- bug#641: bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, Drew Adams, 2011/10/19
- bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/19
bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/10/19