[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9862: 23.3; [Gnus/EasyPG] Mixing PGP/MIME signature with RFC822 forw
From: |
Daiki Ueno |
Subject: |
bug#9862: 23.3; [Gnus/EasyPG] Mixing PGP/MIME signature with RFC822 forwarded multipart message results in an invalid MIME message |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:16:45 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
"S=e9bastien Villemot" <sebastien.villemot@ens.fr> writes:
> This is Debian bug #608279 (http://bugs.debian.org/608279).
>
> If I try to send the following e-mail with Gnus (using MML syntax):
[...]
> Then the message generated by Gnus does not respect MIME
> conventions. The boundary string used for the top-level multipart is the
> same than the boundary string used for the innermost multipart (see
> below for the generated message).
Well, I couldn't actually reproduce it. With the MML from the Debian
bug and got the following. The boundary strings look legal, but
interestingly the rendering seems to be broken. I see
"--====-=-=--\n----------\n" after the line "Foo".
From nobody Tue Oct 25 17:04:52 2011
Message-ID: <m3vcrda4c6.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org>
From: Daiki Ueno <ueno@unixuser.org>
To: ueno@unixuser.org
Subject: test
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:04:45 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=====-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Lines: 39
Xref: localhost.localdomain outgoing.gpg:392
X-Gnus-Article-Number: 392 Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:04:52 +0900
--=====-=-=
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
--=-=-=
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
--====-=-=
Content-Disposition: inline
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="====-=-="
Foo
--====-=-=--
--=-=-=--
--=====-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)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=KT/T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=====-=-=--
Could you try newer Gnus from the git?
Regards,
--
Daiki Ueno