[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:01:53 -0800 |
> > If I've narrowed a very large buffer to a small region, I am
> > not interested in the counts for the entire buffer nor
> > willing to wait for them.
>
> Yes, that's the cost of such combining.
>
> Possible solutions include (a) adding separate commands for
> individual pieces of
> the combination and (b) finding a way (e.g. prefix arg) to
> specify interactively
> to this command that you want only one or two pieces of info,
> not everything.
Another possibility: Do as we do with `apropos' commands. We have both a prefix
arg and a user option, `apropos-do-all', that affect the behavior, with the less
complete, and faster, behavior as the default.
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Dani Moncayo, 2011/11/05
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Juri Linkov, 2011/11/06
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Drew Adams, 2011/11/06
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Kevin Rodgers, 2011/11/08
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Drew Adams, 2011/11/09
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer,
Drew Adams <=
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Juri Linkov, 2011/11/09
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Drew Adams, 2011/11/09