[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:51:15 -0800 |
> > Another possibility: Do as we do with `apropos' commands.
> > We have both a prefix arg and a user option,
> > `apropos-do-all', that affect the behavior, with the less
> > complete, and faster, behavior as the default.
>
> Or
It's not an "or" - the two are orthogonal (except for key binding
choice/conflict). I was talking about how much info is shown. You're talking
about where the info is displayed.
The `apropos' approach is good because it lets users define a personal
preference that might be for seeing more info (=t), yet it also lets users
change the behavior on the fly using a prefix arg.
> do as we do with `what-cursor-position' (`C-x =') that
> prints info in the echo area, but with prefix argument shows
> full details in *Help* buffer.
I don't see the output of even the full info as being something voluminous,
necessitating *Help*. But perhaps you had something more in mind. The info
we've discussed so far should be OK for the minibuffer.
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Dani Moncayo, 2011/11/05
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Juri Linkov, 2011/11/06
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Drew Adams, 2011/11/06
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Kevin Rodgers, 2011/11/08
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Drew Adams, 2011/11/09
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Drew Adams, 2011/11/09
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer, Juri Linkov, 2011/11/09
- bug#9959: 24.0.90; `count-words' command from a narrowed buffer,
Drew Adams <=