bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (fals


From: Ken Brown
Subject: bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive)
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:43:07 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0

On 12/14/2011 12:57 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 12/14/2011 12:30 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
"Such cases" are those where UID and GID are returned as -1 (I think),
see the original report where Jari shows the result of
file-attributes.

OK, I could certainly change check_writable to return success if
euidaccess returns failure and UID and GID are both -1. I'll make a
patch when I get a chance and let Jari test it.

How does the following patch look?

=== modified file 'src/fileio.c'
--- src/fileio.c        2011-12-05 08:55:25 +0000
+++ src/fileio.c        2011-12-15 02:17:01 +0000
@@ -2416,15 +2416,27 @@
   return (st.st_mode & S_IWRITE || S_ISDIR (st.st_mode));
 #else /* not MSDOS */
 #ifdef HAVE_EUIDACCESS
-  return (euidaccess (filename, 2) >= 0);
-#else
+  int res = (euidaccess (filename, 2) >= 0);
+#ifdef CYGWIN
+  /* euidaccess may have returned failure because Cygwin couldn't
+     determine the file's UID and GID; if so, we return success. */
+  if (!res)
+    {
+      struct stat st;
+      if (stat (filename, &st) < 0)
+        return 0;
+      res = (st.st_uid == -1 && st.st_gid == -1);
+    }
+#endif /* CYGWIN */
+  return res;
+#else /* not HAVE_EUIDACCESS */
   /* Access isn't quite right because it uses the real uid
      and we really want to test with the effective uid.
      But Unix doesn't give us a right way to do it.
      Opening with O_WRONLY could work for an ordinary file,
      but would lose for directories.  */
   return (access (filename, 2) >= 0);
-#endif
+#endif /* not HAVE_EUIDACCESS */
 #endif /* not MSDOS */
 }

Jari, can you test it and see if it solves your problem?

Ken






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]