[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10613: 24.0.92; Odd behavior of kill interspersed with suspend: docu
From: |
Kevin Rodgers |
Subject: |
bug#10613: 24.0.92; Odd behavior of kill interspersed with suspend: document or change? |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:10:53 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.26) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/3.1.18 |
On 1/26/12 8:21 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
If a sequence of kill commands is interspersed with a suspend
(suspend-emacs or suspend-frame, for example), then the kills are not
treated as a contiguous sequence, and a following yank does not yank all
the text killed.
This feels a bit odd, as “suspend” is not a normal command: rather like
suspending a computer, I expect that after resuming Emacs, it will be in
the same state as when suspended. But this is not the case: if one
suspends Emacs after a kill command, then on resumption a further kill
will start a new kill-ring entry.
What is abnormal about the suspend-* commands, from Emacs' perspective?
Is this behavior worth reconsidering? If not, is it worth documenting?
(Presumably under suspend, rather than under killing, as I imagine this
behavior changing has implications for things beyond the kill-ring.)
..
--
Kevin Rodgers
Denver, Colorado, USA
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#10613: 24.0.92; Odd behavior of kill interspersed with suspend: document or change?,
Kevin Rodgers <=