[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10751: 24.0.93; BCC in Gnus isn't working
From: |
Stephen Berman |
Subject: |
bug#10751: 24.0.93; BCC in Gnus isn't working |
Date: |
7 Feb 2012 22:22:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) |
On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:02:05 -0500 Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> wrote:
> "Stephen Berman" wrote:
>
>> => My mailbox received two copies of the email, both sent to the address
>> in the To: header line.
>
>> In both there is no Bcc: header line
>
> That's the nature of BCC, no?
Not with an email I sent from Gnus last July; this is how it looks
(aside from the anonymization) in the Gnus Article buffer:
From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
Subject: Bla bla
To: Stephen.Berman@gmx.net
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:32:57 +0200 (29 weeks, 11 hours, 33 minutes ago)
Bcc: xxxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxxxxxxx.xxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx,
xxxxx.xxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx,
xxxx.xxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxxxx.xxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx,
xxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx,
xxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx, xxxx.xxxxxxxx@xxxx-xxx-xxxxxx.xx
Is this wrong? In any case, this mail did arrive at the addresses in
both the To: and the Bcc: header lines.
>>, and there was no email sent to the address in the Bcc: header line.
>
> Works for me.
>
> I don't supposed your bcc address somehow redirects to the To address?
> That would explain why you get two copies.
No, I used addresses that do not have anything to do with each other.
Steve Berman
bug#10751: 24.0.93; BCC in Gnus isn't working, Glenn Morris, 2012/02/07
- bug#10751: 24.0.93; BCC in Gnus isn't working,
Stephen Berman <=