[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days
|
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
|
Subject: |
bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:26:56 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org> writes:
> In Cygwin 1.7, vfork is an alias for fork. The vfork the #define in
> cygwin.h was protecting against is gone. It's better to use vfork now
> so that when Cygwin gains a new, working vfork, we use it
> automatically.
[...]
> -/* vfork() interacts badly with setsid(), causing ptys to fail to
> - change their controlling terminal */
> -#define vfork fork
Sounds sensible to me, but I'm no exactly (ahem) a Cygwin expert.
Eli, what do you think?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Chong Yidong, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Ken Brown, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Ken Brown, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Ken Brown, 2012/04/11
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Glenn Morris, 2012/04/12
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/04/12
- bug#10398: [PATCH] Use real vfork under Cygwin: it's fine these days, Andreas Schwab, 2012/04/12