bug#11508: 24.1.50; Off-by-one error in xg_select?

[Ken Brown]

On 5/19/2012 5:52 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Jan Djärv<jan.h.d@swipnet.se>  writes:
>
> > So the question is, is it more effective to give select the exact value
> > (select works fine if nfds has a higher value than strictly neccessary),
> > or always increment by one in lines 78 and 83?
>
> IMHO it doesn't hurt to be exact, and the patch removes an inconsistency
> which makes it easier to understand the code.

So can I go ahead and make this change?  Jan, do you still object?

Ken