bug#11508: 24.1.50; Off-by-one error in xg_select?

[Jan Djärv]

Hello. 

Go ahead and make the change.

     Jan D. 

21 maj 2012 kl. 00:44 skrev Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>:

> On 5/19/2012 5:52 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Jan Djärv<jan.h.d@swipnet.se>  writes:
>> 
>>> So the question is, is it more effective to give select the exact value
>>> (select works fine if nfds has a higher value than strictly neccessary),
>>> or always increment by one in lines 78 and 83?
>> 
>> IMHO it doesn't hurt to be exact, and the patch removes an inconsistency
>> which makes it easier to understand the code.
> 
> So can I go ahead and make this change?  Jan, do you still object?
> 
> Ken