[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11547: 24.0.96; Was a line accidentally commented out in callproc.c?
From: |
Ken Brown |
Subject: |
bug#11547: 24.0.96; Was a line accidentally commented out in callproc.c? |
Date: |
Wed, 23 May 2012 11:03:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
In the course of trying to debug a Cygwin crash, I noticed that line 643
of callproc.c is commented out. This was done in bzr revision 103252,
and it seems pretty clear from the context of that change that it was
done by accident:
revno: 103252
committer: Jan D <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Sun 2011-02-13 12:28:42 +0100
message:
* callproc.c (Fcall_process):
* process.c (create_process): Replace Gtk with GConf in SIGPIPE
comment.
modified:
src/ChangeLog
src/callproc.c
src/process.c
diff:
=== modified file 'src/ChangeLog'
--- src/ChangeLog 2011-02-13 00:16:28 +0000
+++ src/ChangeLog 2011-02-13 11:28:42 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2011-02-13 Jan Djärv <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>
+
+ * callproc.c (Fcall_process):
+ * process.c (create_process): Replace Gtk with GConf in SIGPIPE
+ comment.
+
2011-02-12 Martin Rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
* window.c (select_window): Check inhibit_point_swap argument when
=== modified file 'src/callproc.c'
--- src/callproc.c 2011-02-12 18:53:24 +0000
+++ src/callproc.c 2011-02-13 11:28:42 +0000
@@ -559,9 +559,9 @@
setpgrp (pid, pid);
#endif /* USG */
- /* GTK causes us to ignore SIGPIPE, make sure it is restored
+ /* GConf causes us to ignore SIGPIPE, make sure it is restored
in the child. */
- signal (SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL);
+ //signal (SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL);
#ifdef HAVE_WORKING_VFORK
sigprocmask (SIG_SETMASK, &procmask, 0);
#endif
=== modified file 'src/process.c'
--- src/process.c 2011-02-12 18:53:24 +0000
+++ src/process.c 2011-02-13 11:28:42 +0000
@@ -2056,7 +2056,7 @@
signal (SIGINT, SIG_DFL);
signal (SIGQUIT, SIG_DFL);
- /* GTK causes us to ignore SIGPIPE, make sure it is restored
+ /* GConf causes us to ignore SIGPIPE, make sure it is restored
in the child. */
signal (SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL);
I don't understand the code well enough to know how critical this is.
The comment preceding that line suggests that it could be a problem for
a build with GConf support.
Ken
- bug#11547: 24.0.96; Was a line accidentally commented out in callproc.c?,
Ken Brown <=