bug#9927: 24.0.90; unexec/unexmacosx fails with GCC 4.6.1

[Peter Dyballa]

Am 29.06.2012 um 19:03 schrieb Samuel Bronson:

> I suppose, though, that if we could be sure that we aren't linking in any 
> static libraries with these *new* BSS sections which will have trouble 
> because of Emacs' dumping them, we could just skip that part; then all we'd 
> need to do is make sure that my_endbss_static refers to an address in 
> __DATA.__bss, not __DATA.__bss1 or __DATA.bss2 like it would naturally end up 
> at on GCC 4.6 or 4.7 (respectively).  (And make unexmacosx.c dump these new 
> BSS sections, of course.)

Apple itself states in 
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#qa/qa1118/_index.html that they "do not 
support statically linked binaries on Mac OS X." And from my experience it's 
really a bit complicated to build them. So your approach should be OK and work 
in the average case. And those few, if at all, who try to build static Emacsen 
on Mac OS X might need something else...

--
Greetings

 Pete

Specifications are for the weak and timid!