bug#12314: 24.2.50; `add-to-history': use `setq' with `delete'

[Stefan Monnier]

>> > Why is it even necessary to talk about destructive modifications, if
>> > we are to advise to assign the result anyway?
>> Not sure I understand the question.  It is because these operations can be
>> destructive of list structure that we advise that.
> If you need to forget about the old value and assign the new one
> returned by 'delete', why does it matter that the modification was
> destructive?

Because it avoids memory allocation.  I.e. 99% of the uses of
delete/delq/nconc are simple optimizations.


        Stefan