[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:22:12 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
> You have to enable `temp-buffer-resize-mode'.
I tried to enable `temp-buffer-resize-mode', and with a large list of files
it seems to ignore `window-combination-limit', i.e. the temporary window
steals space from the window below. A sample test case is:
`M-x temp-buffer-resize-mode', in a Dired window `C-x 3 C-x 2 m m m ...'
(mark 100 files), `!' (`dired-do-shell-command') steals space from the
window below, and `C-g' doesn't restore the initial window configuration.
Is this because `window-combination-limit' is not taken into account?
I see that its default value is `temp-buffer-resize', the same unchanged
value used in the test above.
I also tried a new action `display-buffer-at-bottom', and it doesn't
seem quite right yet. With the same configuration (`C-x 3 C-x 2'),
and two marked files it displays a large almost empty window with just
two lines. `temp-buffer-resize-mode' helps to narrow it, but I still wonder
why this window is not frame'e full-width? I mean the idea was to display
a list of files near the minibuffer prompt of the left side of the frame,
but this list is displayed on the right side of the frame.
> `dired-pop-to-buffer' is no longer called and `dired-shrink-to-fit' is
> no longer consulted.
> If you really insist on handling dired's pop-up buffers separately,
> I can do that by binding `temp-buffer-resize-mode' appropriately, but
> I'd rather have a common solution for handling all temporary windows
> in the same manner.
There is nothing wrong when a package uses a local variable
that changes the general behavior. So `dired-mark-pop-up' could still
call `dired-pop-to-buffer' that will bind `temp-buffer-resize-mode'
according to the value of `dired-shrink-to-fit'. This assumes that
`dired-pop-to-buffer' is the right name for this functionality.
Otherwise, it could be marked obsolete.
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2012/09/22
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2012/09/22
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2012/09/23
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place,
Juri Linkov <=
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2012/09/24
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2012/09/25
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2012/09/25
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2012/09/26
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2012/09/26
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2012/09/26
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2012/09/26
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2012/09/27
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, martin rudalics, 2012/09/27
- bug#1806: dired-pop-to-buffer in wrong place, Juri Linkov, 2012/09/27