[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#411: 23.0.60; flet and byte-compilation
|
From: |
Drew Adams |
|
Subject: |
bug#411: 23.0.60; flet and byte-compilation |
|
Date: |
Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:01:59 -0700 |
> Indeed, because `cl-flet' is a different beast, much more
> like `labels' than like CL's `flet' (it is lexically scoped).
Just out of curiosity (and I haven't followed this thread), why?
Why make `cl-flet' less like CL's `flet'? If you want `labels'-like behavior,
why not define `cl-labels' for that?
Or call this `foobar' or whatever. Calling it `cl-flet' seems the more
misleading the farther the behavior gets from CL's `flet' - no?
Sounds like this is a step backward - in terms of possible confusion, at least.