[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13192: 24.3.50; gdb caught SIG_DFL after launching a process
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#13192: 24.3.50; gdb caught SIG_DFL after launching a process |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:54:14 +0200 |
> from: ivan.kanis@googlemail.com
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:02:36 +0100
>
> I am not sure it's a bug, I don't know what SIG_DFL is.
It means signal handler for signal 'sig' was set to its default value.
> I think I was calling browse-url when it happened. There is no
> xbacktrace. I leave gdb running if someone wants me to look around.
>
> Breakpoint 1, terminate_due_to_signal (sig=6, backtrace_limit=10) at
> emacs.c:315
> 315 signal (sig, SIG_DFL);
>
> #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=6, backtrace_limit=10) at emacs.c:315
> No locals.
> #1 0x081756cb in emacs_abort () at sysdep.c:2113
> No locals.
> #2 0x08173b5c in get_child_status (child=12251, status=0xbfffdae4,
> options=3,
> interruptible=false) at sysdep.c:297
> pid = -1
What is the value of errno in this frame #2?
- bug#13192: 24.3.50; gdb caught SIG_DFL after launching a process, ivan . kanis, 2012/12/15
- bug#13192: 24.3.50; gdb caught SIG_DFL after launching a process,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#13192: 24.3.50; gdb caught SIG_DFL after launching a process, Ivan Kanis, 2012/12/15
- bug#13192: 24.3.50; gdb caught SIG_DFL after launching a process, Ivan Kanis, 2012/12/17
- bug#13192: 24.3.50; gdb caught SIG_DFL after launching a process, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/12/17
- bug#13192: 24.3.50; gdb caught SIG_DFL after launching a process, Paul Eggert, 2012/12/17
- bug#13192: 24.3.50; gdb caught SIG_DFL after launching a process, Ivan Kanis, 2012/12/17
- bug#13192: 24.3.50; gdb caught SIG_DFL after launching a process, Ivan Kanis, 2012/12/21
- bug#13192: 24.3.50; gdb caught SIG_DFL after launching a process, Paul Eggert, 2012/12/21