[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13141: please review bug #13141
From: |
Xue Fuqiao |
Subject: |
bug#13141: please review bug #13141 |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2013 08:54:55 +0800 |
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013 04:35:24 +0400
Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> wrote:
> Personally, I disagree that the user should choose what information to
> include. The report goes to Emacs maintainers, so they should pick the
> always-useful parts (say, the version, bzr revision and build options) and
> leave out the noise.
In (info "(emacs) Checklist"):
You may feel that some of the information inserted by `M-x
report-emacs-bug' is not relevant, but unless you are absolutely sure
it is best to leave it, so that the developers can decide for
themselves.
But *extensible and customizable* (and self-documenting) are the core
of Emacs. Experienced users *know* that what information should be go
to the Emacs developers. It also lightens the burden of Emacs
developers.
--
Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/XueFuqiao
- bug#13141: please review bug #13141, (continued)
- bug#13141: please review bug #13141, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/01/20
- bug#13141: please review bug #13141, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/01/20
- bug#13141: please review bug #13141, Richard Stallman, 2013/01/20
- bug#13141: please review bug #13141, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/01/20
- bug#13141: please review bug #13141, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/01/20
- bug#13141: please review bug #13141, Alan Mackenzie, 2013/01/20
- bug#13141: please review bug #13141, Xue Fuqiao, 2013/01/20
- bug#13141: please review bug #13141, Drew Adams, 2013/01/20
- bug#13141: please review bug #13141, Drew Adams, 2013/01/20
bug#13141: please review bug #13141, Dmitry Gutov, 2013/01/19