bug#13649: boobytrapped dired-do-async-shell-command question

[Stefan Monnier]

>> BTW, one more useful option would be "run it when the current command
>> finishes".
> IIUC, this will require adding a queue of postponed commands,

You could just add-function on the process-sentinel.
But as pointed out elsewhere, another option is to actually let both
processes run in the same buffer.


        Stefan