bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

Thierry Volpiatto wrote:
> Katsumi Yamaoka <yamaoka@jpl.org> writes:
>> Ok, I'll surely try it.

I tried the last patch.

[...]
> ,----[ Replying on github ]
>| A "reply-to" header exists:
>|
>| From: Le Wang <notifications@github.com>
>| Reply-To: emacs-helm/helm
>| 
><reply+i-5357313-fd4754a13604e0814f8932f6f63f437dff55f8d0-1533939@reply.github.com>
>| To: emacs-helm/helm <helm@noreply.github.com>
>|
>| I send a reply with my patch applied:
>|
>| From: Thierry Volpiatto <thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com>
>| To: emacs-helm/helm
>| 
><reply+i-5357313-fd4754a13604e0814f8932f6f63f437dff55f8d0-1533939@reply.github.com>
>| Cc: emacs-helm/helm <helm@noreply.github.com>

Why this /wide reply/ doesn't go to "Le Wang"?  Even if Le Wang
is a subscriber, a regular visitor, or a staff of the Emacs Helm
list, don't we usually include the author of an original mail in
the recipients list if it is a wide reply?  Otherwise if Le Wang's
address is invalid and you want Gnus to exclude it from the recipients
list, you can use the user option `message-dont-reply-to-names'.

>| I send a reply with actual code (bug)
>|
>| From: Thierry Volpiatto <thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com>
>| To: Le Wang <notifications@github.com>
>| Cc: emacs-helm/helm <helm@noreply.github.com>, emacs-helm/helm
>| 
><reply+i-5357313-fd4754a13604e0814f8932f6f63f437dff55f8d0-1533939@reply.github.com>
> `----

Is it ok that both the cases contain <helm@noreply.github.com>?
You can omit it as well using `message-dont-reply-to-names' (if
you want).