[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1
From: |
Jambunathan K |
Subject: |
bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1 |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:26:47 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>> "hi-lock-1", "hi-lock-2", etc. are the best names.
>> My earlier mail asked for making the highlighting face a "core" one. So
>> having highlight-1, highlight-2 etc as "core" themable faces will make
>> theme designers pay attention to it.
>
> We could definitely add such core faces. But in order for that to
> augment current functionality, we still need a way for the user to
> specify the highlighting directly by its attribute.
The last sentence after the comma is not clear to me. You seem to imply
some-"way" is missing. Can someone explain what is meant here?
> Stefan
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, (continued)
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/26
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/26
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Drew Adams, 2013/02/26
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Drew Adams, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Drew Adams, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Juri Linkov, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/26
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/27
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1,
Jambunathan K <=
- bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Stefan Monnier, 2013/02/27
bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/26
bug#13686: hi-yellow vs. hi-lock-1, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/26