bug#14694: 24.3; format-mode-line failing with :eval form via a variable in a conditional construct

[Phil Sainty]

On 24/06/2013 04:45, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> ELISP> (setq indirect-eval '(:eval "indirect eval"))
> ELISP> (format-mode-line '(t indirect-eval "else"))
> > ""
>
> You need (put 'indirect-eval 'risky-local-variable t)

Argh, I see that in the documentation now. Thank you Stefan
(and Eli).

I'm afraid I made an embarrassing rookie mistake in checking
the result of (format-mode-line indirect-eval) instead of
(format-mode-line 'indirect-eval), and thinking that I was
seeing an inconsistency when there was none. Otherwise I'd no
doubt have spotted the information about that property.

My apologies; please close.


Eli asked:
> And anyway, why would you need format-mode-line to produce a
> different value?

The specific goal was to enable customisation of the display of
`mode-name' in the mode line (generally to abbreviate it and reduce
the space used) *without* also affecting what is displayed when that
variable is processed in other contexts (such as by `describe-mode'),
in which cases `format-mode-line' will be called.

Advising `format-mode-line' to provide an indicator variable to use
in a conditional construct does facilitate this. I just wanted check
that I wasn't missing another approach which didn't require the advice.


-Phil