[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14616: 24.3.50; Excessive cursor movement on non-X Emacs
From: |
lee |
Subject: |
bug#14616: 24.3.50; Excessive cursor movement on non-X Emacs |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:16:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
lee <lee@yun.yagibdah.de> writes:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>>> + start emacs (just normally)
>>> + M-x gnus RET
>>> + enter a group that has messages all marked as O
>>> + press enter with the cursor on the first message in the summary buffer
>>> + that message is displayed and the cursor in the summary buffer moves
>>> down by two messages, i. e.:
>>>
>>>
>>> O Message 1 <--Cursor
>>> O Message 2
>>> O Message 3
>>> O Message 4
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>> becomes
>>>
>>>
>>> O Message 1
>>> O Message 2
>>> O Message 3 <-- Cursor
>>> O Message 4
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>> I would expect the cursor to remain on Message 1. Now when I 'C-x b
>>> some-other-buffer' to switch to another buffer from the summary display
>>> --- or run 'emacsclient some-file' --- and then 'C-x o' to the message
>>> buffer and then press 't' to display the message headers, Message 3 is
>>> suddenly displayed instead of Message 1 (without showing the headers).
>>
>> Sounds like an entirely different problem from the one reported by
>> Lars in this bug report. Why did you think they are the same?
>
> Uh, I don't think they are the same.
Oh, I think now I know what happened: I made --- or wanted to make --- a
bug report about the behaviour I described above, and that report had
"cursor" in the subject. Apparently, at about the same time, Lars made
another bug report.
Then when I looked here for the bug report I made (searching for
"cursor"), I found Lars' report and thought it was the one I wanted to
make because it also has "cursor" in the subject. I'm sorry for the
confusion!
The report I wanted to make apparently never was sent. Should I make a
new report? Can anyone reproduce the behaviour I've described?
--
"Object-oriented programming languages aren't completely convinced that
you should be allowed to do anything with functions."
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/08/01.html