[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14843: 24.3.50; `line-move', `line-move-visual' need doc strings
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#14843: 24.3.50; `line-move', `line-move-visual' need doc strings |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:19:12 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Cc: 14843@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > > Perhaps it is also a small wonder that NONE of the uses of `line-move',
> > > including those in simple.el itself, make ANY USE of the additional
> > > parameters introduced in Emacs 22 (and not used even in 22).
> >
> > That's not true. These arguments are used by next-line and previous
> > line.
>
> Yes and no. One of them is used; the other (TO-END) is not.
It is documented to be unused.
> But you're missing the point. Neither is used in any of the zillion uses
> of `line-move' - other than `(next|previous)-line'. And that lends some
> support to the idea that those programming those uses might not have even
> understood these undocumented parameters.
The arguments to next/previous-line are all documented now.
- bug#14843: 24.3.50; `line-move', `line-move-visual' need doc strings, Drew Adams, 2013/07/11
- bug#14843: 24.3.50; `line-move', `line-move-visual' need doc strings, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/07/11
- bug#14843: 24.3.50; `line-move', `line-move-visual' need doc strings, Drew Adams, 2013/07/11
- bug#14843: 24.3.50; `line-move', `line-move-visual' need doc strings, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/07/11
- bug#14843: 24.3.50; `line-move', `line-move-visual' need doc strings, Drew Adams, 2013/07/11
- bug#14843: 24.3.50; `line-move', `line-move-visual' need doc strings, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/07/12
- bug#14843: 24.3.50; `line-move', `line-move-visual' need doc strings, Drew Adams, 2013/07/12
- bug#14843: 24.3.50; `line-move', `line-move-visual' need doc strings,
Eli Zaretskii <=
bug#14843: 24.3.50; `line-move', `line-move-visual' need doc strings, Stefan Monnier, 2013/07/11