[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 1
From: |
Sebastien Vauban |
Subject: |
bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006 |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:05:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (windows-nt) |
Glenn Morris wrote:
> "Sebastien Vauban" wrote:
>
>> BTW, I was expecting it to be so, as I'm using a Git copy of Org [1] -- this
>> was not said in my mail. Hence, if a change in Org was responsible for the
>> problem, I *should* have it in both Emacs versions or not at all, no?
>
> What this for sure would mean is that it is pointless to report it here,
> as opposed to the Org list.
I know, I just wanted to write that explicitly. The problem is not Org related,
even if it's more visible within Org.
> Although you originally said:
>
>> What's become slow:
>> - movements (<down>, <C-home>, etc.) in Org files
>> - movements (<down>, <C-home>, etc.) in mails
>> - maybe other stuff (not yet tested)
>
> I don't see how point 2 can be Org-related.
It's not.
See a comparative demo when moving point in a *Gnus summary buffer* on
http://screencast.com/t/Qr5KxNgCYL. Every movement is much slower there.
Though I don't use rev 115085 much because of those problems, I tried to bite
the bullet and worked a bit more with it. I can tell you the problem is NOT
general. For example, moving point inside a Java buffer is quick, as expected.
Currently, I constantly observe the performance problem inside:
- Org files,
- Gnus summary buffers.
I don't observe it in:
- Java files,
- Gnus group buffer,
- Org files (when major mode is changed to `text').
> But then I have no idea what setup you are using.
>
> If you think Emacs is generally slow, then please post a recipe
> starting from emacs -Q that shows the problem, preferably not involving
> Org (since it has many moving parts).
I'll try to do that later today. But it seems it won't be obvious, as the only
spots where I observed them are Org and Gnus, and I guess you'd like not having
any of these two enabled in the recipe.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/11/12
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Glenn Morris, 2013/11/12
- Message not available
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/11/13
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/11/13
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/11/13
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/11/13
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Glenn Morris, 2013/11/13
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006,
Sebastien Vauban <=
- Message not available
- Re: bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/11/14
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Glenn Morris, 2013/11/14
- Message not available
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/11/19
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Stefan Monnier, 2013/11/19
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/11/19
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/11/19
- Message not available
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/11/20
- Message not available
- Message not available
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/11/20
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/11/20
- Message not available
- bug#15876: 24.3.50; Highly degraded performance between rev 114715 and 115006, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/11/26