[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#15995: 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' mu
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#15995: 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:21:19 -0800 (PST) |
See http://stackoverflow.com/a/20271019/729907.
I was thinking that the doc is already clear enough about this. But I
guess I agree with `phils' that it wouldn't hurt to stress that if you
do something else between `C-M-w' and the kill then the `C-M-w' has no
effect.
In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.2 (i686-pc-mingw32)
of 2013-11-28 on LEG570
Bzr revision: 115271 rgm@gnu.org-20131128203155-qjc1xsp19z2k64b2
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7601
Configured using:
`configure --enable-checking 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3' CPPFLAGS=-DGLYPH_DEBUG=1'
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#15995: 24.3.50; doc of `append-next-kill': emphasize that `C-M-w' must immediately precede the next kill,
Drew Adams <=